Hoax video compilations

The Worlds Greatest Hoaxes : Secrets finally revealed (PART 1) Posted by: Memeori Video duration: 660 seconds Global video hits: 108202 This program first aired in 1998/1999. It shows some of the best and worst hoaxes of the 20th Century. Related: worlds, greatest, hoaxes, secrets, finally, revealed, hoax, alien, bigfoot, ufo, yeti, loch, ness Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: There's a mountain ... By: Cosmored3. on 24 May 12, 20:24:14 There's a mountain of proof that the moon missions were faked. Here's a link to some of it. spurstalk (dot) com/forums/showthread (dot) php?t=144487 Also,? do a YouTube search on "MarsFaker". Hope you still ... By: Memeori. on 21 May 12, 16:26:57 Hope you still enjoying? the video. Dodge on, ... By: reclaimerReclaimer. on 06 May 12, 22:40:07 Dodge on, eminaidiot.? Dodge #1121 ... By: eminboztepe. on 06 May 12, 20:25:17 Dodge #1121 komoididiot, lol. ? Ken Peterson? Come again, ... By: reclaimerReclaimer. on 06 May 12, 18:31:28 Come again, eminaidiot?? Dodge #1120 ... By: eminboztepe. on 06 May 12, 15:22:18 Dodge #1120 komodoidiot, lol.? Ken Peterson? Who's that, ... By: reclaimerReclaimer. on 06 May 12, 14:15:27 Who's that, eminaidiot? Another? one of your lies? The snow one? That ... By: eminboztepe. on 06 May 12, 04:03:10 The snow one? That was made by FOX for a tv show called "paranormal borderline" that aired in the 90's. It's? common knowledge. Dodge #1196 ... By: eminboztepe. on 06 May 12, 04:01:57 Dodge #1196 komodidiot, lol. Ken? Peterson? Clearly not closed ... By: reclaimerReclaimer. on 29 Apr 12, 13:19:36 Clearly not closed and? eminbozo knows it, which is why she's still trying desperately to convince the sad suckers but it's not working and it never will. @eminboztepe yea ... By: LawrenceMartinez559. on 28 Apr 12, 00:09:54 @eminboztepe yea that case closed bt what about the one in the snow or? the one where those people got a video sent to them with no name or return address on it huh explain that one.And if you just say it aint real thats you all that is is your opinion same with the guys on this video its their opinion until they got real HARD evidence they actually cant say whats real and whats not if they arent there to see it for them selves Al DeAtley WAS ... By: eminboztepe. on 27 Apr 12, 00:57:08 Al DeAtley WAS there. He was the one who financed the hoax, and has admitted it in recent? years. Case closed. all these comments? ... By: LawrenceMartinez559. on 25 Apr 12, 22:06:37 all these comments? and comments in this video are just opinions some say its real some say its not.Were you there when they shot the film?There are things in this world we cant really be sure about.Is there another world?is there life on other planets?is everything they are teaching us in schools and on television true? we dont know.Maybe big foot,aliens,and other Hoaxes are real maybe not the only way we could comment on these suspitions is if we have hard proof that is it or is not real!!!! These weren't ... By: doksekko. on 24 Apr 12, 10:24:02 These weren't really great hoaxes...they? were all pretty obviously not real.. try and make me ... By: nastymonsters2. on 17 Apr 12, 18:11:34 try and make me cunt....again your know fuck all...6.4.same as Jim McClarin..fact you stupid? clueless danish gayboy stfu, troll. ? By: reclaimerReclaimer. on 17 Apr 12, 17:54:12 stfu, troll. ? Jim McClarin 6.4 ... By: nastymonsters2. on 17 Apr 12, 17:24:10 Jim McClarin 6.4 exactly the same height as the pgf suit...same distance from the camera..walking the? same route..6.4 komo you tard komo the peado ... By: nastymonsters2. on 17 Apr 12, 17:17:56 komo the peado still in her own little trolling world...6.4 you dumb geek..and a man in a shitty suit..? wrong faggot..its ... By: nastymonsters2. on 17 Apr 12, 17:16:32 wrong faggot..its 6.4 you clueless child rapist...post your proof faggot...even the ubber liar munns cant get prove its more than 6.4...your a trolling babbling child molester? ..who still spouts the same babble..7ft in your peado dreams you cunt stfu mad tart, 7ft, ... By: reclaimerReclaimer. on 17 Apr 12, 16:56:11 stfu mad tart, 7ft, now fuck? off naive shithead. stfu peado...no it? ... By: nastymonsters2. on 17 Apr 12, 13:41:42 stfu peado...no it? hasnt still trolling your utter bullshit..6,4 max you dumb fuck.its a suit you lazy unemployed clueless fag The Patterson ... By: reclaimerReclaimer. on 15 Apr 12, 18:01:53 The Patterson film's actually no hoax, this has been proven many times by now and why it's impossible to fake due to the totally different forms of anatomy our? two species have. We have long legs and small torsos, it's the very opposite for them. Nothing in this film fits the guy saying he's in a suit, doesn't fit any person, so the figure can't be his 6ft when the (non-resembling) legs are all seen yet the upper body's longer. Must be taller then, and that fits the 7ft concluded mostly. Patterson is a fake ... By: miko4137. on 09 Apr 12, 17:30:04 Patterson is a fake that foo? was making a movie about bigfoot nd he knew ppl would only watch if he got film of bigfoot One of the biggest ... By: Cosmored. on 06 Apr 12, 15:12:20 One of the biggest hoaxes in history was the Apollo moon landings.? They were faked in a studio. Here's a link to some of the proof. spurstalk (dot) com/forums/showthread (dot) php?t=144487 People? speak of ... By: MrSchpankme. on 05 Apr 12, 21:23:36 People? speak of FREEDOM, yet they drive around in Vehicles "REGISTERED", and their Bodies "LICENSED" to the Corporate STATE. The People voluntarily participate through consent, registration and words-of-art to the CITY OF LONDON Corporation known as the UNITED STATES (U.S. INC); pretending to be the Organic, bankrupt Government of 1776. FREEDUMB ... search: "THE THREE CITY STATES" see youtube: Season of Treason Full see youtube: Santos Bonacci? Reclaiming Dominion Part 1 Hoax - 11/26/11 - Chicago, IL Posted by: blougaville Video duration: 970 seconds Global video hits: 13477 11/26/11 Crazy Spirit Hoax Culo Skrapyard Other Women 2201 W Huron St. Chicago, IL Related: crazy, spirit, skrapyard, culo, chicago, hardcore, raw, nerve, vile, gash, youth, attack Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: not macho just? ... By: forward300. on 26 May 12, 21:29:11 not macho just? angry. im a faggot, you ... By: Cori Thompson. on 24 May 12, 21:58:03 im a faggot, you told me so, im a faggot, you let me know. and when I? die, you'll know why hearts help...... ... By: Apalmeic5. on 19 May 12, 13:43:45 hearts help...... chicago summit 2012,safe camps? ? george evil bush said awhile ago dissadents would go to camps..rex 84 camps too.... more on ooochange......twitter the mutants? will ... By: somoanuevos. on 10 May 12, 23:23:39 the mutants? will overcome! The music? is ... By: xXbestefarXx. on 06 May 12, 22:02:12 The music? is fucking hard, shame they have to go around punching and hurting each other like macho assholes.. I thought? GG Allin ... By: MegucaMeduca. on 16 Apr 12, 17:05:16 I thought? GG Allin died? i love this? ... By: scumthrash666. on 27 Mar 12, 20:10:04 i love this? fucking band, nice show, greetings from russia! at? 6:25 you ... By: dvdvcr1. on 26 Mar 12, 03:52:39 at? 6:25 you totally see Mark McCoy taking pictures in the far left of the screen. Bad Fucking Ass! this looks? like ... By: voltagejunkie666. on 23 Mar 12, 23:44:02 this looks? like the best shit ever. Wish I hit up the toronto show. love this band, ... By: PunkerMetalhead. on 15 Mar 12, 15:25:01 love this band, they put on? a good show. Down, its on? their ... By: pancakethebunny14. on 29 Feb 12, 06:43:13 Down, its on? their new EP these fine young ... By: DeathByArtSchool. on 24 Feb 12, 22:41:31 these fine young gentlemen are the? future winners of world war 3. if anyone from NWI ... By: 0lotustower0. on 24 Dec 11, 04:04:19 if anyone from NWI was there? im sure they did. fucking awesome? ... By: franklydarko. on 22 Dec 11, 21:38:02 fucking awesome? show! big hug from mexico bro? party. By: nicesh0es. on 20 Dec 11, 04:52:27 bro? party. Thanks for ... By: blougaville. on 18 Dec 11, 09:23:04 Thanks for pointing? that out. Fixed! dude what song? is ... By: BlastEast. on 01 Dec 11, 05:41:57 dude what song? is at 6:19 ive never herd it before I'm a fagget, you ... By: Dinwrinkle. on 30 Nov 11, 14:55:08 I'm a fagget, you told me so. I'm a fagget,? you let me know. And when I die you'll know why. There's? a lot of ... By: happythrasher. on 30 Nov 11, 07:56:24 There's? a lot of secret man-lust in that room. Nice to see :) Fuck? By: RottenHaggisDeath7. on 30 Nov 11, 03:39:15 Fuck? yo just? a heads up ... By: RadAlarm. on 29 Nov 11, 22:25:59 yo just? a heads up. The description says 11/16, but the title says 11/26. lyrics to first ... By: protestsong00. on 29 Nov 11, 19:51:37 lyrics to first song? also why doesnt anyone punch the singer back. get ignorant fools? dudes started ... By: kingdiamondking. on 28 Nov 11, 16:11:50 dudes started throwin? a box fan around. some heads were definitely bonked. flyers at? reckless By: Joker9805. on 28 Nov 11, 15:43:10 flyers at? reckless Moon Landing Hoax - Wires Footage Posted by: DanielsNews Video duration: 181 seconds Global video hits: 3341778 We can see the wires, people! Related: moon, landing, hoax, wire, wires, footage, astronauts, cosmos, space, armstrong, apollo, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, lie, conspiracy Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: NASA puppets? show By: ApolloWasRealHoax. on 27 May 12, 01:04:41 NASA puppets? show The moon rocks ... By: snakehipsohoolihan. on 26 May 12, 23:55:24 The moon rocks found in Antarctica have passed through the atmosphere, and show obvious signs of atmospheric reentry, and no zap pits. If you grind off the atmospheric entry outer, the zap pits can not show either. . Lasers reflected from the retroreflectors have a much higher rate of return than those from The surface. These are facts. What have you got? Fuck all. So quit trolling and fuck? off. Ae. Fuck, you? are ... By: snakehipsohoolihan. on 26 May 12, 23:50:33 Ae. Fuck, you? are dumb. No, you are wrong. ... By: Aeronauticalexplorer. on 26 May 12, 18:21:43 No, you are wrong. I have searched for years to prove the Moonlandings and the result was that there is no proof and yet tons of evidence that they never walked on the Moon. People keep mentioning Moon Rocks and reflectors as "proof" but i can pick up the same rocks in ablation zones in Antarctica and reflectors are not needed to bounce lasers. The list goes on and on and covers everything you can come up with. All of which could have? easily been fabricated by NASA. So NO, no proof whatsoever. When I'm sad, I ... By: nameofthepen. on 26 May 12, 16:38:19 When I'm sad, I come? over here and look at these marionettes on wires. :D There is plenty of ... By: Waroftheworlds112. on 26 May 12, 12:55:30 There is plenty of proof for the moon landings, you and all other hoaxers are too hard? headed, trolls looking for attention, or just sad people with no time on their hands. A: Getting the ... By: Waroftheworlds112. on 26 May 12, 12:53:42 A: Getting the materials over to the Moon would cost a lot? of money. B: Construction, who would build it and how? C: Should something happen, the response time to get help to the base would be too long. We left behind ... By: kabazt. on 26 May 12, 11:26:41 We left behind reflectors? that we use to measure the distance between the earth and the moon. I've used them myself. Trust me, they're real. Here's a sequence ... By: kabazt. on 26 May 12, 11:23:44 Here's a sequence that looks like it was done by? a five year old. Next stop: ? the ... By: nameofthepen. on 26 May 12, 05:37:50 Next stop: ? the planet VULCAN! Then again, at 2:50 ... By: MrSkunkwork100. on 26 May 12, 04:59:03 Then again, at 2:50, he says that the footage of the astronauts had to have been slowed down, yet earlier, he claimed that they were suspended from wires (to simulate reduced gravity, etc) in the first place. Because the? astronauts had reduced equilibrium, they were faking and suspended from wires? Come on, now! Here's a question none of the hoaxtards ever bother to answer: how is it that they were able to get the astronauts moving so fast on an articulated, fixed wire system to begin with? At 1:50, Percy says ... By: MrSkunkwork100. on 26 May 12, 04:51:52 At 1:50, Percy says: "It's as if the weight has been taken off? the astronauts feet just a second or so, too soon." So, because they weren't bogged down by earth's gravity, due to being in an environment where there's only 1/6th, they had to have been suspended from wires??? Just think: had the ... By: MrSkunkwork100. on 26 May 12, 04:48:58 Just think: had the Russians spent more time on their space program and less time signing death warrants and developing a nuke program: they might have actually made it to the moon as well.? Wow I can't believe ... By: ItalianGuy7788. on 26 May 12, 02:25:33 Wow I can't believe people still don't believe that we went to the moon. For fucks sake people.? We went to the moon. I can't believe you Communists are still upset that you didn't get there. c mon guys answer ... By: DERRUFO360. on 26 May 12, 00:39:24 c mon guys answer kris- all real okays to do science work by NASA go through kris first ....? funny stuff guys-- ... By: DERRUFO360. on 26 May 12, 00:17:00 funny stuff guys-- I? guess I am still alive .... The United States ... By: NASACrooks. on 25 May 12, 13:35:02 The United States Of Bullshit? in America. America landed on ... By: UTUBENWO. on 25 May 12, 11:46:51 America landed on the disney moon One day if man ever gets to the moon then the first thing they will do is build a space station on the moon The current space station is 200 miles from earth Nasa? Moon Joke The rest of space ... By: UTUBENWO. on 25 May 12, 11:45:34 The rest of space you? MORON FAKING? IT IN SPACE ... By: UTUBENWO. on 25 May 12, 11:44:41 FAKING? IT IN SPACE W I R E S What parts of? ... By: krisdevalle. on 25 May 12, 07:26:43 What parts of? space would you be exploring if you had a moon base? If America landed ... By: MrMegadenny1983. on 25 May 12, 06:39:08 If America landed on the moon, why havent they made some sort of? station right? More understanding of space exploration ??? Huh ?? What ? Oh , ... By: COMMOGSE. on 25 May 12, 04:39:43 Huh ?? What ? Oh , i forgot i was talking to a total fake . Sorry , never mind ! Now whats with the ... By: Aeronauticalexplorer. on 25 May 12, 04:35:30 Now whats with the "white wing" and whats with the "chicken man" ? And why are these comments linked to another place or? website? LOL ! I guess ... By: COMMOGSE. on 25 May 12, 04:29:43 LOL ! I guess somebody had sex? with you then ! Whatever you say chicken man ! 10 Infamous Hoaxes Posted by: alltime10s Video duration: 170 seconds Global video hits: 179695 10 Infamous Hoaxes They made fools out of thousands of people, here are 10 infamous hoaxes. Music = Washboard Rag by Robert Bruce Where else to find All Time 10s... Facebook: ow.ly Twitter: ow.ly Check out a selection of video's highlighting some Alltime10's favourite and interesting people.. @ www.youtube.com Related: alltime10s, video, list, top 10, hoax, april fools, april fools day, fool, april, prank, stunt, joke, famous, trick, funny, comedy, idiot, chess, rabbit, piltdown, fairies, cottingley fairies, the artist, silent movie, ape, mermaid, gravity, patrick moore, nasa, planet, science, fake, evolution, missing link, hitler, diaries, nazi, history Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: ohohoho! it's funny ... By: ILeftTheTVOn. on 27 May 12, 01:08:12 ohohoho! it's funny cuz he is gay and writes crappy music :p? Fuck you the 9/11 ... By: K1RO313. on 26 May 12, 15:45:05 Fuck you the 9/11 was just another excuse to attack the Arabian people for oil, if you cant see the truth but you only see what is shown on the media then you are? the one with the 0 IQ i know 1 infaous ... By: asyasb94. on 26 May 12, 13:39:09 i know 1 infaous hoax... JB? is awsome. Lulz umad? because ... By: Trololowin. on 25 May 12, 03:27:54 Lulz umad? because your governments lieing to you ;) @alltime10s THE ... By: debashishjena. on 24 May 12, 18:59:12 @alltime10s THE BIGGEST HOAX OF THIS ERA WOULD? BE THE END OF THE WORLD IN 2012......... umm you might not ... By: SuperTristan03. on 24 May 12, 18:25:14 umm you might not looked at the title of this? vidio it says HOAXES 9/11 is not a fucking hoax if it was there would be a war happening right now what are you gonna say next the hindenburg was also a hoax shut your fucking mouth and i know your obviasly trying to get people to post a trillion coments yelling at you but just sjut up becuase if you really think 9/11 is a hoax then your IQ is basicly 0 if you just want to play around well fuck you because 9/11 was some serious biz Wheres 9/11?? By: Trololowin. on 22 May 12, 03:23:48 Wheres 9/11?? It's absolutely not ... By: truthslap. on 20 May 12, 03:03:41 It's absolutely not true that "all theories are welcome",? that is not how science works. astrology, much like holistic medicine, psychics, fairies and? religion don't need to be disproved, the burden of proof lies with those making the claim. In order for astrology to be considered a science, it must be based on the scientific method using evidence, otherwise it's nonsense. you know all this ... By: FingerMyFinger. on 20 May 12, 01:43:18 you know all this started from a? typo i actually did mean to say astrologer but then i thought it over, and it does seem astrology being astronomy actually is a contentious subject, even in the scientific community. whether it be a ... By: FingerMyFinger. on 20 May 12, 01:38:17 whether it be a false science to some or a? true science to others, it being only judged by the community is irrelevant. astronomy is any considered science with scientific methods as long as they study the stars, all theories welcome. until astrology be disproved, which it still has not been, then it would not be a science thus not making it astronomy. science is not the ... By: truthslap. on 20 May 12, 00:09:37 science is not the same as pseudoscience,? just like fur is not the same as faux-fur. astrology does not produce any reliable information, it is not recognized as a science anywhere in the developed world. @ADHR26 its ... By: FingerMyFinger. on 19 May 12, 09:56:21 @ADHR26 its relevance is not a factor, the defintion of astronomy is simply the use of science to study the stars etc, and thats exactly what astrology is calculating, analyzing, and predicting, thats the science and its focus being the stars etc. whether it? be recognized as actual or not is irrelevant. i know right?? but ... By: DubstepVenny. on 16 May 12, 17:00:22 i know right?? but instead the most popular channels are shit "fred", gotta love it i hate the google ... By: futureseanmalto. on 16 May 12, 15:06:08 i hate the google drive commercial it so fuckin? long People who say its ... By: maneatingbanana. on 15 May 12, 01:04:33 People who say its 2012 21 Dec than your wrong. It hasn't happened yet and you can't prove it's gonna happen or? not. I'm on the neutral part of the 2012 thing, idrc if it happens or not :P #0 December 2012? ... By: Sylux9501. on 14 May 12, 17:26:38 #0 December 2012? end of the world. Why isnt this ... By: HappyMiniMimi. on 10 May 12, 17:00:35 Why isnt this channel bigger?!!? this is an amazing channel! Deserves? way more viewers! Nah I don't but it ... By: Ringvireot. on 06 May 12, 08:30:08 Nah I don't but it - creationists argue and/or debatthe same ol' theory about the missing link thus concluding the idea it's still missing. Whereas evolutionists have the? correct thought the missing link has been solved for thousands of years. :D That wasn't an ... By: Icanglqueen. on 05 May 12, 02:24:46 That wasn't an intentional hoax. They said at the beginning of the program that none of the story was real. People tuning in that missed that? announcement just freaked out and started the mass panic. how cud it hav? ... By: Dynamicz98. on 04 May 12, 14:49:12 how cud it hav? been fake These? videos r ... By: miles brown. on 03 May 12, 12:56:26 These? videos r awsome the one tht scared me was the first one in 10 questions no awnsers I love the? little ... By: Uitsdo. on 03 May 12, 00:42:11 I love the? little music that plays on this video:) what? about war of ... By: KLINGY94. on 03 May 12, 00:06:36 what? about war of the worlds radio hoax????? no? cure for cancer ... By: TheGooseTavern. on 02 May 12, 14:58:55 no? cure for cancer.... Top 5 Science Conspiracies, Theories and Hoaxes Posted by: DiscoveryNetworks Video duration: 229 seconds Global video hits: 739332 Discovery-News.com: James Williams uncovers five spooky scientific mysteries you may never have heard of. For more science news stories, check out www.discovery-news.c om Related: top, video, weird, science, conspiracy, hoax, theory, roswell, alien, ufo, flying, saucer, lost, cosmonaut, cardiff Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: @drewlaplanche if a ... By: ZefVolk. on 25 May 12, 07:22:26 @drewlaplanche if a government was covering something up and would? happily kill to silence people, surely they would have removed any evidence from the internet long ago? saying the government won't admit to something isn't really a valid defence, if you asked them about their armies of cyborg dinosaurs they would ignore you for being a loony. So does that mean they are denying the truth? you have to wonder ... By: BroadcastThis2me. on 25 May 12, 00:50:15 you have to wonder though how many conspiracies are regarded as ridiculous but possibly have validity to them. There must be some origin to each idea, as? some are so fantastic that they could not have been the brainchild of some random person. Yeah, that's what I ... By: MinorCheese777. on 25 May 12, 00:06:41 Yeah, that's what I was thinking, where did all? the water come from? Wow way to go in ... By: EmeraldPlatoon92. on 25 May 12, 00:02:29 Wow way to go in putting words in my mouth. I believe the government may have had done something or still do at area 51 but it is unlikely to me that EVERY theory is true about the government.? Life is just too boring and we don't live in a Dan Brown book. What YOU fail to see is that everything can be made to look like a conspiracy:The bible doesn't say the "Jesus was not an alien" therefore he was one doesn't seem right.Answer this: If the theorists' info is the truth, why sell books for money? So is every ... By: drewlaplanche. on 24 May 12, 23:54:02 So is every conspiracy really made up?Theres not even 1 time when the government tells us something not true to keep control?With all the conveniant deaths or "disappearances" of whistleblowers and informants you can say all that is also a conspiracy and made up?You're saying the government has? NEVER covered up anything that would make them look bad?I'm just asking...you say the only reason conspiracies exist is to sell books.That sounds like an explanation the Warren Commission came up with. the earth didnt ... By: Erik Pineda. on 24 May 12, 19:26:34 the earth didnt grow thats Bull evolution blows? no they exist? ... By: EmeraldPlatoon92. on 24 May 12, 18:52:54 no they exist? because they can cause controversy and sell books and idiots like you don't realise it Conspiracies exist ... By: nsycko. on 16 May 12, 21:40:29 Conspiracies exist because? the government is too stupid to admit the truth! No, the reason why ... By: kanimo24. on 14 May 12, 01:37:44 No, the reason why conspiracies exist is because people don't like accepting facts and choose to believe in nonsense. How many conspiracy theories have actually? been proven true? In? San Diego? By: kanimo24. on 14 May 12, 01:27:26 In? San Diego? if the growing ... By: ZefVolk. on 13 May 12, 07:37:22 if the growing earth thing is true, then most of the planet would have been under water or ice and the seas? would currently be getting more shallow lololol? By: lumpfish99. on 07 May 12, 04:34:56 lololol? and that? is why ... By: HELLHamster16. on 06 May 12, 14:21:56 and that? is why your logic = fuck all lolol u mad bro?!! ... By: lumpfish99. on 06 May 12, 11:08:00 lolol u mad bro?!! you in high school? huh!!!! fool. 240p...... we meet? ... By: HeroesZeroes. on 05 May 12, 04:16:49 240p...... we meet? again kid your "pure ... By: HELLHamster16. on 04 May 12, 20:15:41 kid your "pure logic" is a simple way of saying none therefor? you are wrong therefor fuck off, have a nice day fuck wad. paranoid? idiot? i ... By: lumpfish99. on 04 May 12, 17:37:57 paranoid? idiot? i didnt tell you what my? proof is,,,,,yet you make those assumptions? lololol.....are you in high school? no thats really? ... By: HELLHamster16. on 03 May 12, 17:35:19 no thats really? not logic its called being a paranoid idiot. pure? logic. By: lumpfish99. on 03 May 12, 05:39:22 pure? logic. and your proff? is? By: HELLHamster16. on 02 May 12, 22:50:51 and your proff? is? Really?? By: wesselbindt. on 02 May 12, 06:32:26 Really?? well thats the ... By: lumpfish99. on 26 Apr 12, 05:32:28 well thats the official line....the reality is there are now over? 3000 architects and engineers around the world who call that bs. It's pretty ... By: MrGamerDerek. on 26 Apr 12, 02:13:08 It's pretty straight forward really. WT7 collapsed due to structural failure. This happened after steel support columns were weakened caused? by fires in the building. MIND? FUCKED!!! By: sharpiey57. on 22 Apr 12, 23:40:49 MIND? FUCKED!!! you? have saved my ... By: PineappleExpressing. on 12 Apr 12, 17:31:03 you? have saved my life. The Top 10 Greatest Hoaxes of All Time Posted by: vlogbrothers Video duration: 239 seconds Global video hits: 1410857 We like to pretend like we're hard to fool...but we're not. The entire world has been fooled lots of times. All it takes is a good story and some clever staging. I don't think we should worry about it so much. Alien autopsies, moon people, mermaids, and more, we get fooled a lot. Related: hoax, hoodwink, hornswoggle, buffalo, scam, fleece, swindle, foogify ok, i made that last one up Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: It rather upsets me ... By: MegaBookWormGirl. on 26 May 12, 23:54:18 It rather upsets me that Sir. Arthur Conan Doyal, my mystery novellist freaking idol, believed in the fairie photo hoax and was frothing-at-the-mouth evangelical about it's authenticity. That is, until Harry Houdini proved to him it wasn't, and then they weren't friends anymore xP He was an amazing author, but? a little bit of a weirdo. And if I have just botched history terribly, I apologize. Another really, ... By: DeepForestHighSeas. on 26 May 12, 08:15:35 Another really, really funny Hoax is the Ice-worm thing. Scientists around the world were convinced that there were blue-and-red worms? living in the ice in northern canada, because of a 9amnt to be funny) news article. robert Service even wrote a poem about them :P at the exit of the ... By: CrazyNerdMonkey. on 26 May 12, 03:09:56 at the exit of the video my screen froze so i thought he faked his death ? @pingoJK I take it ... By: ThisisGallifrey19. on 23 May 12, 06:23:46 @pingoJK I take it you're not a Nerdfighter.? This guy makes me ... By: noobtastic23. on 22 May 12, 02:40:44 This guy makes me want? to do drugs... He would be kinda cute if he wasn't so flail like... Who knows if some ... By: vacster123. on 22 May 12, 01:52:00 Who knows if some things he said are false or not? So yeah we can be fooled, it? would be funny if you made a fake story here, it would be iroic You missed the ... By: AnaRchyxAeonzZ. on 21 May 12, 20:21:48 You missed the Ghostwatchers.? that is highly ... By: lowaces. on 21 May 12, 17:29:52 that is highly debateable but his music? sure has sucked since about 1966/1967 look at the crap hes pumped out the last 30 odd years, garbage if he went on tour only doing stuff from the last 30 years there'ld be no audeinece SO BRAVE? By: glacialwaysz. on 21 May 12, 01:51:14 SO BRAVE? This guy is funny, ... By: pingoJK. on 21 May 12, 01:03:15 This guy is funny, but he moves his hands and arms way too much. Also what? up with the ending wtf? Hoax? #1- Anonymous ... By: atittel7. on 20 May 12, 21:18:56 Hoax? #1- Anonymous should be feared. How could people ... By: cakebomb77. on 20 May 12, 17:35:28 How could people believe that? That's so unrealistic.? Another Hoax was ... By: LogoLaughs. on 20 May 12, 05:37:25 Another Hoax was called World Jump Day. It was when everyone on earth supposedly jumped and the? earth's axis changed by 5 cm. One more reason why ... By: MsNekokitty. on 20 May 12, 01:59:41 One more reason why Poe is? my favourite poet. greatest hoax = ... By: lowaces. on 19 May 12, 23:53:10 greatest hoax = governemnt cares? about us #2 theres a god Oh and by the way,? ... By: MrBeatleGeorge. on 19 May 12, 23:26:32 Oh and by the way,? Paul McCartney is not dead... Hoax number? nine.. ... By: suuperdoopur. on 19 May 12, 05:38:54 Hoax number? nine...two fingers? @skatty14 What...? By: Matthew Jones. on 19 May 12, 05:23:36 @skatty14 What...? The holocaust! haha? By: skatty14. on 17 May 12, 09:08:10 The holocaust! haha? ...I TOTALLY ... By: haricela38529. on 16 May 12, 04:38:14 ...I TOTALLY GUESSED CORRECTLY? WHAT NUMBER ONE WAS!!!! thank You grandpa and english Class where i Had do participate in a Play type thing Made about it. so? damn over ... By: cokiwokeys. on 16 May 12, 02:50:56 so? damn over reacted...lol.. he said 242...? By: crashman1231. on 16 May 12, 00:06:56 he said 242...? omg, sorry but ... By: MordorLordSauron. on 13 May 12, 01:41:23 omg, sorry but listening to you speaking is freaking annoying. Could have been? done better You missed jesus ... By: selectivehater. on 12 May 12, 02:41:54 You missed jesus and? his whore mother. 42 months in prison ... By: PowerMindAlchemist. on 09 May 12, 22:17:30 42 months in prison?? /42/??? XD Yeah, I just HAD to point that out.? The Hoax 2007 Movie trailer Posted by: rocka1969 Video duration: 150 seconds Global video hits: 75203 Trailer Related: hoax, trailer Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: This movie was ... By: YAYFORFUCKING. on 09 Aug 11, 01:45:24 This movie was filmed in? my Mother's house she grew up in! :O "The? crazier it is ... By: Tails137. on 08 Aug 11, 20:38:02 "The? crazier it is, the more believable it sounds! It's perfect!" "In theory." I reading? the book ... By: fiod86. on 17 Mar 11, 07:55:27 I reading? the book now, it´s ok. no ur fat girl who ... By: ninlandon. on 22 Dec 10, 03:31:26 no ur fat girl who likes the smell and taste of fish and? carpet.. We can't stop ... By: HDFEST. on 20 Nov 10, 08:39:07 We can't stop watching? this trailer! I fell asleep ... By: Akoan92. on 24 Jul 10, 08:40:02 I fell asleep right? after your first sentece... americans are like ... By: bigbother1. on 17 Jul 10, 19:18:31 americans are like clones of each other with out their own character thats why all their teeth look the same lol i take it you got your teeth straightened also lol nothing specail about you i guess, their are 300 million of you? in america only one of me, cause i have my own character with my teeth aww your a lesbo? ... By: bigbother1. on 17 Jul 10, 19:15:11 aww your a lesbo? great lets? have sex very? good! By: oOOpIIIqOOo. on 13 Jul 10, 20:51:44 very? good! haha? watching this ... By: dionstrezlecki. on 28 May 10, 12:57:16 haha? watching this now lol Do? not try this at ... By: MrWesley3000. on 10 Apr 10, 21:54:27 Do? not try this at home..... seriosly it will get you in SOOOOOOOOO..... much trouble.... This was a great ... By: PerrrsianBelle. on 05 Apr 10, 05:07:08 This was a great movie... especially knowing this really happened. It reminded me of "Catch me if you? can". astonishing? movie, ... By: greatMACDONALD. on 01 Jan 10, 18:52:33 astonishing? movie, admired it here tinyurl(dot)com/ybmatyw (the beginning of ... By: randomlaughingman. on 24 Jul 09, 15:58:54 (the beginning of this comment has? been censored by You Tube - they actually filter the whole phrase from being added to comments! see my channel comments for the phrase that is meant to show up here): .........there was no missing 18 minutes on the Watergate tapes; it was just that on that section of the tape someone was doing an impression of Charlie Brown's teacher. It is worthing i? ... By: HBKJEFFHARDY. on 08 Jun 08, 10:41:46 It is worthing i? recommend it for sure Well to be honest, ... By: MaximoBean. on 01 Mar 08, 18:18:14 Well to be honest, most people use the word 'gay' in an opposite sense. For example, the word sick usually implies something is disgusting, but people are known to describe something as really good as 'sick'. If we? take the origins of the word gay, it means merry/happy, so if we reverse that it means bad. Not everyone is using the word gay to portay being homesexual as a gay thing. Oh and by the way - I'm a lesbian with exceptional teeth! Well to be honest, ... By: MaximoBean. on 01 Mar 08, 18:17:56 Well to be honest, most people use the word 'gay' in an opposite sense. For example, the word sick usually implies something is disgusting, but people are known to describe something as really good as 'sick'. If we take? the origins of the word gay, it means merry/happy, so if we reverse that it means bad. Not everyone is using the word gay to portay being homesexual as a gay thing. Oh and by the way - I'm a lesbian with exceptional teeth! wait wait..u from ... By: elsoda. on 01 Mar 08, 00:58:39 wait wait..u from england? i only though that ignorant americans would say? the word gay. now i realize that bad teeth idiots from england also use it! lol..nice idiot! cleveland, ohio i though 20times ... By: elsoda. on 01 Mar 08, 00:57:34 i though 20times before renting this movie. i am not even in the middle of it and all i have to say is...WHAT A GREAT MOVIE! funny as hell, its just a great movie! i am glad i rented it? tonit. thanks for the ... By: darooz. on 13 Feb 08, 12:40:09 thanks for the spoilers you moran! why do you think people watch trailers? because they have already seen the movie?? it is GAYYYYYYYYY ... By: MaximoBean. on 06 Feb 08, 16:54:18 it is GAYYYYYYYYY like? your mum hahah is that something u ... By: bennybonge. on 02 Feb 08, 18:36:42 is that something u just revealed from the movie confidence trickster? in that case suck my? balls u genouite cock. hahaha, he got ... By: ConfidenceTrickster. on 25 Jan 08, 02:11:04 hahaha, he got caught in? the end, hes still alive :) Saw? the movie ... By: sv3rige. on 16 Jan 08, 17:37:37 Saw? the movie yestarday :D Really worth watching it This Hoax Affects Everyone Posted by: mhfm1 Video duration: 1437 seconds Global video hits: 469076 www.vaticancatholic. com This video contains absolute proof that the votes are not being used. Related: vote, fraud Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: Mythbusters Moonwalk hoax Posted by: Dolfan0925 Video duration: 491 seconds Global video hits: 361437 Debunking Moon video footage Related: mythbusters, moon, landing, hoax, conspiracy Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: That's why it's ... By: AgentFour. on 24 May 12, 00:05:34 That's why it's called the Vomit? Comet. What has this got ... By: ytmoog. on 20 May 12, 18:59:39 What has this got to? do with the video? Cancer is very hard ... By: Mahoganybiscuit. on 18 May 12, 15:34:09 Cancer is very hard, if not impossible to cure because it simply mutates too fast and we will find a cure, then it will evolve and t won't be curable, what is more worthwhile to put money into is early detection, so you can detect abnormal cells in your body before there are more than enough? to form a tumor @niku10 the moon ... By: meg5730. on 18 May 12, 02:14:28 @niku10 the moon isn't a planet regardless if someone lives on it. The moon is a moon because it orbits around a planet (earth). Planets aren't planets because something lives on them; in that case the only planet would? be earth. Sounds? like you're ... By: SpreadingtheMuse. on 14 May 12, 23:18:38 Sounds? like you're protesting TOO much. I'll have fries with that ;) LOL and that makes ... By: SpreadingtheMuse. on 13 May 12, 20:54:26 LOL and that makes you any? better WHY exactly? ;) I don't? read ... By: hunchbacked. on 13 May 12, 15:31:30 I don't? read monnhoax webpages, I write them. "dont trust them" ... By: SpreadingtheMuse. on 13 May 12, 15:13:03 "dont trust them" Yet you naively believe every moronic hoax? webpage you ever read. Go figure ;) "talking machine" ... By: SpreadingtheMuse. on 13 May 12, 15:11:53 "talking machine" which can be proven? Or is this just another "I read it on a nerd webpage and? gullibly believed it?" I'm sorry if my ... By: OrgonVpH7. on 13 May 12, 15:06:10 I'm sorry if my comment touched? you so profoundly!...I know, the truth hurts. The fact they ... By: NASACrooks. on 09 May 12, 22:49:29 The fact they talking about the theory that Russians? should have called the hoax is one of the lowest points Apologists are forced to live with and use as an argument. They are so stupid they don't even realise it.The "why the Russians" argument was even used by the chief crook Buzz Aldrin himself !!.In? legal terms it's actually comical. It's like I claim to have had an affair with Elizabeth Taylor for many years (in the 60s) and the proof is that her husband never said anything...LOL! I've looked at CGI ... By: loperspest. on 09 May 12, 15:58:32 I've looked at CGI from that? time. While I have seen some fairly impressive stuff, for the time, no, everything could *not* be simulated in a video, much less the 16mm DAC films of on-board activities. Anything can be ... By: hunchbacked. on 09 May 12, 09:28:13 Anything can be simulated in? a video. I am talking about ... By: loperspest. on 08 May 12, 23:59:42 I am talking about the Apollo television broadcasts and 16mm films taking during trans-lunar coast. The 'Apollo 13' movie used parabolic? flights and a series of short takes for much of its zero g portions, but Apollo does not do that. Instead you see long, extended stretches of freefall, which is impossible on Earth. As for faking voice, if you look at the Apollo transmissions, there is banter with CAPCOM about things that happened *that day*, for example when All Star Game got rained out. The transmissions ... By: hunchbacked. on 08 May 12, 19:39:10 The transmissions can be faked without the astronauts being aboard. In the case of Gagarin, his voice was seeming to come from space, but in fact it? was a talking machine which was in his cabin which was talking for him. You can't use ... By: loperspest. on 08 May 12, 18:29:30 You can't use planes like the vomit comet for zero g for a bit more than 30 seconds at a time, the? astronauts need to be in space, with working spacecraft, in order to fake Trans Lunar Coast transmissions and film. Even your fellow conspiracy theorists, like David Percy and Bart Sibrel acknowledge this. Oh faked films and? ... By: hunchbacked. on 08 May 12, 17:13:36 Oh faked films and? transmissions. I don't trust them! The CSM is shown ... By: loperspest. on 08 May 12, 16:55:24 The CSM is shown docked with the LM during TLC transmissions? and film. Therefore communications, life support, pretty much every system had to be functional. The only the only systems they *might* be able to get away with would be the LM engines themselves but that's not where you claim inconsistencies, and even they would have had to work in Apollo 9. Precisely not; the ... By: hunchbacked. on 08 May 12, 10:20:03 Precisely not; the technology which shows flaws is the one of the lunar module, and the lunar? module has never landed on the moon. The incoherences have intentionally been introduced by the engineers to blow the whistle. That technology you ... By: loperspest. on 08 May 12, 06:23:08 That technology you claim has 'inconsistencies'? would have had to work even in a hoax, considering even most conspiracy theorists agree you can not produce free fall for the periods seen in the transmissions and film on Earth and therefore it was done in orbit, which means the radios, heck the CSM/LM stack, had to operate as claimed. It is obvious that ... By: hunchbacked. on 03 May 12, 09:16:03 It is obvious that the fakers wanted the moon hoax to be exposed. And in the technology too they have put? plenty of intentional incoherences. It is more than obvious that people who participated in the project were not agreeing with what the CIA was forcing them to do. If they had wanted ... By: hunchbacked. on 03 May 12, 09:14:11 If they had wanted the fakers would have been able to show something convincing; they would have made the flag behave normally? (i.e. behave like in the demonstrations of the MB), they would have made all shadows coherent, represented the earth with a normal size, represented a normal sun (which reflects normally on visors), put some stars in the sky; instead of that they did their possible to make as many incoherences as possible, more than enough to feed a moon hoax. true true... so? ... By: badsaddamdotnet. on 03 May 12, 03:17:17 true true... so? what then? :( Or experienced ... By: SpreadingtheMuse. on 30 Apr 12, 22:21:35 Or experienced professionals? who actually work for a living ;) If a pack of GED Mcds clerks whine online pretending to know space engineering, be assured, they're laughed at No, even arguments ... By: hunchbacked. on 26 Apr 12, 06:56:23 No, even arguments about the flag and shadow are not busted: The flag on the Apollo videos does not flap at all like in the demonstrations of the Mythbusters, and I have explained? why, and, concerning the shadows, even if the divergence of shadows may exist in some cases, if you analyze the photos of Apollo, taking into account the photographer's shadow, you realize that they are not correct. Nintendo ON Hoax Posted by: SorcererAndrex Video duration: 381 seconds Global video hits: 181982 Shortly before Nintendo officially unveiled the Wii/Revolution at E3 2005, Pablo Belmonte from Spain created this video and posted it on a message board, calling it the "leaked Revolution trailer." We know now it is fake, yet we want to believe. Related: nintendo, revolution, wii, on, e3, 2005, pablo, belmonte, hoax, joke Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: haha me? too By: VolcanicPenguin. on 25 May 12, 01:54:38 haha me? too lol i remember this ... By: swiv2d. on 20 May 12, 19:48:45 lol i remember this and thought it was real at? the time. It's not real.? ... By: skully367. on 22 Apr 12, 11:19:11 It's not real.? Seriously. It was created by someone called Pablo Belmonte, AKA "psyco3ler". Google it. watch the history ... By: supermrmario123. on 22 Apr 12, 08:55:28 watch the history of? nintendo Would be more ... By: Demlats. on 21 Apr 12, 18:57:25 Would be more convincing if? these consoles looked like believable boxes and not fucking retarded. NOT SURE IF? SERIOUS By: skully367. on 21 Apr 12, 09:18:06 NOT SURE IF? SERIOUS its not fake ... By: supermrmario123. on 21 Apr 12, 07:34:05 its not fake nintendo was going to make nintendo on but got canled? Reggie himself went ... By: Mewtario. on 10 Apr 12, 14:00:38 Reggie himself went on the record and left an offer for the maker of this trailer? to work for them. 4:35 So the Brain ... By: 47948201. on 05 Apr 12, 05:48:26 4:35 So the Brain doubles as a microwave? No wonder Nintendo never? used this idea. everybody knew it ... By: JetSetSonic. on 02 Apr 12, 03:46:51 everybody knew it couldn't be? true, but i think it goes without saying nintendo should've hired this man straight away I would liked to? ... By: firebloxice1. on 20 Mar 12, 04:03:45 I would liked to? play dead rising 2 and deadspace on that thing Knew it was fake ... By: KeijiKG. on 20 Mar 12, 00:03:17 Knew it was fake ever since I saw the video because of Mario and Link appearing off-model and anyone that said "Well, that's? because of the new graphics technology" back then can go fuck themselves for being pants-on-head retarded back in 2005/2006. pegadinha do? ... By: mega331. on 28 Feb 12, 21:40:33 pegadinha do? malandro esse videogame!!!! For those ... By: phatcorns. on 19 Feb 12, 20:20:24 For those interested, the music is from the movie The Rundown and it's composed by Harry Gregson Williams. The track is called "Guns." You can get it off of iTunes (unfortunately not available at all on Amazon), but unfortunately you cannot just purchase this track, you have to buy the whole album for $9.99. The songs aren't available for purchase individually.? 7? years ago...and ... By: dasfeuer. on 19 Feb 12, 07:06:10 7? years ago...and still is amazing head? on By: MrAlekz. on 12 Feb 12, 04:03:44 head? on This was an amazing ... By: MrSkyBunny72. on 07 Feb 12, 05:19:21 This was an amazing fan trailer and the guy must've put a lot of time and effort into making it. Love watching it to this day? :) 4:35 TV or? ... By: DerUniversalHacker. on 02 Feb 12, 15:28:53 4:35 TV or? Microwave, we don't know it They could make ... By: JTr0cker81. on 23 Jan 12, 20:56:06 They could make this sorta thing with a 3D type system like on the 3DS. Thatd be? pretty sweet. wow? it was all ... By: ryith. on 11 Jan 12, 23:48:36 wow? it was all great and totally convincing untill the mario apperared this thing is way? ... By: jonnofinster7. on 04 Jan 12, 19:11:07 this thing is way? cooler than the stupid wii Maybe, Nintendo? ... By: PrimeTF. on 24 Dec 11, 13:23:12 Maybe, Nintendo? Wii On Nintendo RLZ xD? By: linkfrieds. on 14 Dec 11, 22:56:49 Nintendo RLZ xD? Esto es un trailer ... By: jeannuel. on 01 Dec 11, 10:37:35 Esto es un trailer fake hecho por un fan? de nintendo.. muy viejo, viejisimo, no habia salido el Wii. Andaba con el nombre de Revolution. no se sabe si esta ... By: A2R5Kanintor. on 30 Nov 11, 00:50:58 no se sabe si esta consola es de verdad o de mentira pero,que el trailer esta bueno,esta? bueno Hoax - Jericho Posted by: UKFDubstep Video duration: 151 seconds Global video hits: 565645 420 Records Competition (DubstepForum) - bit.ly Jericho by Hoax, another monster from 4:20 Records (420RECS003), you can get this on promo in a couple of weeks, with a full release hitting MP3 Stores and your local record shop mid March. This will be released alongside Fukked Up Music and Physical - 'The Mantis'. www.myspace.com www.ukfmusic.com Related: hoax, jericho, dubstep, ukfdubstep, music Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: youtube,com/watch?v ... By: AstroDanceMusic. on 25 May 12, 19:29:01 youtube,com/watch?v=HxQNwwugfY4 shameless? self-promotion ... By: btrak08. on 24 May 12, 21:30:01 POPOPOPOPOPOPOPOPOPOOOOWWWWWWWWWWWWWW? hoax is from ... By: OscarWilkins. on 22 May 12, 21:10:41 hoax is from genetix? hoax = genetix,? so ... By: MrVjezaveur. on 18 May 12, 21:24:17 hoax = genetix,? so he used the same bass synth lol? By: 1Thaper. on 18 May 12, 16:17:02 lol? Why do fat people ... By: TheAllergyPistol. on 17 May 12, 23:24:10 Why do fat people always talk? like that? Sounds alot like ... By: crjMUSIC8. on 16 May 12, 22:37:25 Sounds alot like Squid attack ? ¤ Hi guys my name ... By: itzkekkula. on 09 May 12, 16:17:39 ¤ Hi guys my name is felken. ¤ I produce dubstep. i think you should check it out and leava a? comment? :D ¤ Trust me. You won't be dissapointed! squid attack, honk, ... By: jman7946. on 05 May 12, 02:59:50 squid attack, honk, digga digga digga (;? You can be proud ... By: Cortexcze. on 04 May 12, 18:40:29 You can be proud now.? SAME <3 that? video ... By: JullesRogue85. on 30 Apr 12, 19:23:11 SAME robot brushing his? ... By: JFlaxx. on 30 Apr 12, 17:09:24 robot brushing his? teeth xD AWESOME you? don't ... By: MrJiffyPOPPOP. on 28 Apr 12, 20:57:40 AWESOME you? don't say Russian Dubstep ... By: Kaimich19. on 23 Apr 12, 22:50:38 Russian Dubstep Dance brought? me here! Hmmm.... nice point? By: ilovemusic1194. on 20 Apr 12, 00:18:15 Hmmm.... nice point? Well? no pauses By: DubSalat. on 10 Apr 12, 22:19:45 Well? no pauses Safe, glad you? ... By: AtomicDubstep. on 10 Apr 12, 14:31:18 Safe, glad you? think so. Cheers mate Alright, don't? cry ... By: AtomicDubstep. on 09 Apr 12, 22:19:46 Alright, don't? cry about it! Haha, u mad? that ... By: jaimyweetzelluf. on 09 Apr 12, 19:13:48 Haha, u mad? that he's right? This comment? is ... By: TheUltimateTrance. on 09 Apr 12, 16:33:53 This comment? is just so fucking awesome I can't explain it... No shit, Hoax is ... By: AtomicDubstep. on 09 Apr 12, 16:09:57 No shit, Hoax is part of Genetix...? Mythbusters Moon Landing photo hoax 1 Posted by: Dolfan0925 Video duration: 256 seconds Global video hits: 1124183 Debunking "Multiple light sources" myth. Related: mythbusters, moon, landing, hoax, conspiracy Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: The reply button is ... By: ytmoog. on 25 May 12, 18:08:05 The reply button is to your right -> It is the one which says 'Reply'? on it. Instead of waffling and calling people liars perhaps you ought to try making a point and supporting it with some evidence. do you really think ... By: ItsMySexyLooks. on 24 May 12, 04:35:33 do you really think this show is 100% real!?!? this must have been backed up by the illuminati.? for shits and ... By: rickkmurray. on 24 May 12, 04:14:21 for shits and giggles I simulated? this in 3D Max and it confirmed what they just made :P Reply to ytmoog. ... By: David Hunter. on 23 May 12, 21:05:15 Reply to ytmoog. My God! You're Captain Pudding! You're Captain Fucking Pudding under another cowardly alias. Pudding was an idiot whose parrot-cry? was 'perspective', he did not understand it then any more than you do now, and he was chased off the internet in ignominy about a year ago.This is hilarious - a year has passed and you have learned nothing. You still think the old garbage will work. Almost incidentally, if you have not seen the image you have no opinion. If you have, you are a liar. Incidentally your ' ... By: ytmoog. on 23 May 12, 18:39:01 Incidentally your 'perfectly? flat terrain' isn't. Do you? know what ' ... By: ytmoog. on 23 May 12, 18:13:52 Do you? know what 'perspective' is? Holy Mother of God, ... By: David Hunter. on 23 May 12, 16:57:32 Holy Mother of God, save me from these morons! I am aware, of course, that a large part of your strategy is to bore people to death so let? us take a SPECIFIC EXAMPLE. Go to the thread 'did we land on the moon? part 3 of 5, and stop the film at 4:29. The image here shows widely divergent shadows on PERFECTLY FLAT TERRAIN. Get it? And don't give me any more crap about going outside on a sunny day. I live in London, I might have to wait a long time. Knowledgemonger? This is a joke, right? Have you never gone ... By: knowledgemonger. on 23 May 12, 14:55:00 Have you never gone outdoors and looked around? Shadows follow the contour of the surface they fall on. How? is it exactly that people can believe this "shadows at angles" nonsense ? It is just one of the most bogus claims ever made. Anyone who has been outdoors on a sunny day will have seen that the claim is just total rubbish and yet here people are making that claim. arrest the? apollo ... By: NASACrooks. on 23 May 12, 10:49:46 arrest the? apollo crooks Reply to ... By: David Hunter. on 23 May 12, 10:37:01 Reply to Spreadingthemuse. If you are seeing shadows shoot off at? a tangent in front of you, you need to get your eyes checked. Should have gone to Specsavers. The reason you don't get several shadows from different lights is because the each light is aimed at a different part of the set -the same reason why you don't get actors throwing multiple shadows in the movies.And this is your killer argument? Jeez, I'll have to take up something that engages the other 7/8 of my brain - this is too easy. Make a shadow on a ... By: SpreadingtheMuse. on 23 May 12, 07:06:07 Make a shadow on a curved surface, watch the two lines curve away, and then tell us all again why topogrpahy has nothing to do with it. ? Are we to beleive you or our own lying eyes? "fake lights" is all shot down with one question no hoax pusher has ever answered. HOW can you have multiple lights without mulitple shadows? "Unless of course ... By: David Hunter. on 22 May 12, 21:40:19 "Unless of course they use a lens to focus the light. Which they did." Do you really think you can get away with this diversionary bullshit? There is no mention of a 'lens' anywhere in the film.They used an ordinary studio lamp. And of course shadows follow the terrain they fall on, but? they fall in the same direction whatever the terrain. By the way, maybe you could tell us who are the moneymen behind this drivel - they wouldn't be the same people who are paying you, would they? "If the light ... By: ytmoog. on 22 May 12, 20:31:34 "If the light source is 12 feet away..." Unless of? course they use a lens to focus the light. Which they did. "Topography has nothing to do with it." Shadows follow the terrain they fall on. It really is idiotically simple. The answer to these ... By: David Hunter. on 22 May 12, 15:23:43 The answer to these clowns is idiotically simple. If the light source is 12 feet away from the objects the shadows will diverge. If it is 93 million miles away,? they will be parallel. Topography has nothing to do with it. An important question to ask is who pays them to produce this nonsense. "There's no gravity ... By: ytmoog. on 21 May 12, 19:09:35 "There's no gravity on the Moon..." Actually? there is. You appear to use ... By: knowledgemonger. on 21 May 12, 13:50:33 You appear to use the word "skeptic" incorrectly. The skeptics point of view is, "I don't know" until the proof is provided. It is a very different thing to the "I believe in spite of the evidence" nature of the "we never went to the? moon" cult. Take the example of the shadows at angles claim. A skeptic would notice when they were outdoors on a sunny day that the whole premise of the claim is simply false because shadows follow the contour of the ground they fall on. The Truth of the? ... By: Spyguy679. on 21 May 12, 02:48:44 The Truth of the? Moon Landings is a deception by doubt Skeptics? If Astronauts were to Fake the Moon Landings Why would they pay so much money to do it in a Movie Studio? There's no gravity on the Moon so the Astronauts could bounce back on their spacesuits! The Actors portraying the Astronauts couldn't do that in a Studio because they would fall down and hurt themselves? It doesn't make sense to me it's a waste of their time and Where's The Proof? NASA did land on the Moon! End The Skepticism? I was pointing out ... By: knowledgemonger. on 20 May 12, 22:38:35 I was pointing out the often ignored 3rd person because that brings the total to 18 vs 12. That is a lot more people who went as far out as the moon even if not all of them touched the moon. Those 6 people took nearly all the risks but got none of the fame. It shows? something important, I think, about the sort of people who do great things like moon landings. The Apollo 10 crew also took big risks. They all trusted their lives to science and the spacecraft builders. Yes. Only? 2 of ... By: SpreadingtheMuse. on 20 May 12, 21:44:40 Yes. Only? 2 of the 3 landed with the LEM. So its 12 who moonwalked, 18 who made the journey Each Apollo flight ... By: knowledgemonger. on 20 May 12, 17:07:00 Each Apollo flight had 3 people. One stayed in orbit in the? command module. thank? you By: ljubljana80. on 17 May 12, 15:27:57 thank? you And a? pleasant day ... By: loperspest. on 16 May 12, 19:06:42 And a? pleasant day to you. Ok this we can ... By: SpreadingtheMuse. on 16 May 12, 17:36:03 Ok this we can answer. How many separate groups on separate missions? 6. Apollo 11, Apollo 12, Apollo 14, Apollo 15, Apollo 16, Apollo 17 Six different groups, at different times in different ships on different dates. 2 men? per mission pleasant day? day ... By: horseofblack. on 16 May 12, 14:15:23 pleasant day? day to both of you. "the two phrases ... By: ytmoog. on 16 May 12, 12:58:42 "the two phrases refer to the same concept" No they do not. If you don;t understand the difference I suggest you learn something about the scientific method. "...except the busters do not demonstrate a? valid conclusion" Yes they do. They show very well that terrain effects apparent shadow angles. They do this by showing a control shot on a flat terrain which shows parallel shadows then another image where the terrain has a small hill on it which shows apparently non-parallel shadows. Mythbusters Moon Landing photo hoax 2 Posted by: Dolfan0925 Video duration: 242 seconds Global video hits: 510430 Debunking Astronaut in shadow of LEM myth. Related: mythbusters, nasa, moon, conspiracy Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: I answered it, and ... By: loperspest. on 25 May 12, 19:47:07 I answered it, and yes, I have looked at it. The fact is though, Mythbusters weren't trying to replicate it exactly, only trying to show that it wouldn't be pitch black, the myth tested. You claim that no one makes that claim, but? that's wrong. Need I mention David Percy again? Clips and even complete rips, of his videos are uploaded to youtube, so there must be conspiracy theorists who agree with his claims. Come on, loperspest ... By: David Hunter. on 25 May 12, 17:18:25 Come on, loperspest, come out of the corner - there is a? question for you here and you have quite long enough to work out how you are going to avoid answering it. Hit the reply ... By: loperspest. on 25 May 12, 17:18:23 Hit the reply button next time. And Mythbusters only used the *average* albedo for the entire moon. Some places are darker, some are lighter. Looking at the moon with the naked eye will? tell you that. They still debunked the myth tested, that at least David Percy has claimed, that it should be pitch black. If they tested your myth, they might have gone for further accuracy, but any illumination is enough to bust the myth tested. still is way darker ... By: zarni000. on 25 May 12, 16:48:41 still is way darker than the original yet you can see that the ground on the MB mockup is lighter......busted my ass... this show is so weak? but they outdid themselves here... To loperspest. ... By: David Hunter. on 24 May 12, 21:00:14 To loperspest. Did you look up the image and compare it to? the NASA photograph? If you are going to ... By: loperspest. on 24 May 12, 11:43:42 If you are going to reply to me, there is a reply button. That way I receive an e-mail from youtube and I can reply to you in a much more timely fashion. As for my alleged "divert[ing] the argument", I merely was pointing out that you were wrong? to say that no one made the claim tested, that Mythbusters is using a strawman, when in fact one of the most well known Apollo conspiracy theorists did in fact do so. I believe this is known as 'moving the goalposts'. This is a poor ... By: David Hunter. on 22 May 12, 22:02:48 This is a poor effort, but unfortunately typical of the shill's habitual attempt to divert the argument. What you need to do is look at the image at 3:08 on the film, then look at the NASA photograph and come back and tell me that no additional fill-in light was used on the latter picture. I doubt that even a practised shill like yourself would have? the gall to assert something that everyone can see is false. In reply to loperspest. "Nobody has claimed ... By: loperspest. on 22 May 12, 19:41:44 "Nobody has claimed that the 'astronaut' would be black to invisibility if he were in the shade of the module; " Actually, David Percy, author of 'Dark? Moon', which is available in almost its entirety on Google Books, makes *exactly * this claim. If I was NASA I ... By: David Hunter. on 22 May 12, 17:23:53 If I was NASA I would be frankly worried if a pair of dorks like these kept 'proving'? me right.Nobody has claimed that the 'astronaut' would be black to invisibility if he were in the shade of the module; he would be, as is inadvertently shown here, dimly seen - you know,as if he was in deep shadow. Stop the film at 3:08 and you will get a reasonable idea of how the NASA photo should look. Now look at the official photograph - anyone who still believes he is not lit up is,unfortunately,an idiot. It should be ... By: RaspK. on 12 May 12, 09:26:40 It should be pointed out that they succeeded in another respect as well: the moon's surface has not a mirror-like specular reflection, but rather a diffuse reflection; read on these two as well as on radiosity to get a picture of the subject, if you are not used to the notions. Plainly put, their mixture has the powdery consistency and similar reflective properties as the soil on the Moon, thereby giving it this funny lighting? property. Cast light on plaster or marble dust to check these out. Hey check out the ... By: viraltruth1776. on 08 May 12, 17:08:11 Hey check out the channel smash240 to see fake planes and? helicopters, are they plasma holograms with haarp? He says they're demons, is this what the planes were on 911? Is this what Chemtrail planes are? Reality debunks ... By: loperspest. on 07 May 12, 15:49:33 Reality debunks this one. panoramio*com/photo/35559506 panoramio*com/photo/3743809 (replace? asterisks with periods before copying into address bar) The irony is the ... By: loperspest. on 07 May 12, 15:46:49 The irony is the common pejorative used by them for people who disbelieve the conspiracy theorists. I've said this to conspiracy theorists, if you disagree with the results, do the experiments yourself.? Some, like a 1/6 g ride in a replica spacesuit, or overshoe prints in lunar simulant in a vacuum chamber, might be less doable but this one is definitely testable by the average viewer. It's been done full ... By: ytmoog. on 07 May 12, 13:53:24 It's been done full scale with the same? result. As has been mentioned. It's a SCALE MODEL! ... By: miloholbrook. on 07 May 12, 13:42:52 It's a SCALE MODEL! Do? I have to explain the rest to you aswell? Thanks for that, ... By: MTMind2. on 07 May 12, 07:29:29 Thanks for that, I'll add it to my list of sources (in fact, I've seen that page before? but I hadn't noticed it was part of a longer series titled "Anomalies Explained", which is excellent!). What it highlights is that many of these hoax claims can be tested by those who make the claims, and yet that rarely ever happens, instead they believe without question all that they've seen in moon hoax films. A rather simple ... By: loperspest. on 07 May 12, 06:14:05 A rather simple small scale experiment? was done by this guy in Canada. In fact, he goes one further than Mythbusters by also taking photos where he separates his model from ground reflected light to show that air is not a significant source of reflected illumination, and therefore small scale tests done in air are valid. w w w3*telus*net/summa/moonshot/fillit*htm You think their ... By: ytmoog. on 07 May 12, 01:21:09 You think their light put out as much light? as the sun? Really? sweet jesus,you ... By: stellastey. on 06 May 12, 15:54:52 sweet jesus,you come out with a comment like that and have the audacity to? call someone else a 'cock'. Then why wasn't the ... By: MTMind2. on 06 May 12, 15:52:53 Then why wasn't the guys in the desert in pitch black too? :) Like I said, all they had to do was prove the astronaut would be illuminated to debunk the claim, and they succeeded. For the MBs photo to be more accurate, they need a model with the same reflective index as the astronaut's suit, use a larger set, set the camera to the same settings as the camera that took the original photos and use the same film they used at the time? (they captured the images digitally). So room for improvement :) Look how much light ... By: miloholbrook. on 06 May 12, 15:15:22 Look how much light they have used to achieve half the brightness. If they used the right amount of light then? the astronaut would have been in pitch black I believe. That's just my opinion though :) The level is ... By: MTMind2. on 06 May 12, 15:01:40 The level is irrelevent, the hoax claim is that there should be nothing illuminating objects in shadow, i.e. that everything in shadow should be BLACK. MythBusters? proved that claim wrong. Here's another video that debunks that claim (as well as many others), watch the following from 23:23 onwards, listen to the hoax claim made and then see the results on their 'moon set'; /watch?v=t4tk-3KeYNQ As they and MBs show, light reflecting from the surrounding surface illuminates objects in shadow. DISNEY APOLLO ... By: UTUBENWO. on 06 May 12, 12:20:39 DISNEY APOLLO MYTHBUSTER PROPAGANDA JEW QUEERS JAMIE AND ADAM? THE SPECIAL MORONS APOLLO ZERO ZERO STARS ZERO MOON LANDINGS 3:53 Sane ... By: miloholbrook. on 05 May 12, 18:17:06 3:53 Sane reflectivity as the moon, You can see him more clearly in the NASA shot and you can see that the Nasa shot is not reflecting anywhere near as much light as their set. Their 'moon' is VERY bright. They have their minds made up already and will try anything? to prove they're right. Exactly, if the ... By: holdemehha. on 05 May 12, 02:05:33 Exactly, if the moon landing was actually? a hoax, then NASA did a horrible job with it Mythbusters Moon Footprint Hoax Posted by: Dolfan0925 Video duration: 509 seconds Global video hits: 298693 Debunking how a footprint could be made without water or water vapor on the Moon. Related: mythbusters, moon, landing, hoax, conspiracy Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: Nixon wasn't even? ... By: loperspest. on 01 May 12, 05:44:45 Nixon wasn't even? president when, if what is claimed by conspiracy theorists about the Van Allen belts were true, the first fake flight would have occurred. Nixon was a bad? ... By: joaosebastiaobach. on 28 Apr 12, 20:16:51 Nixon was a bad? boy hehehe I don't kown how ... By: joaosebastiaobach. on 28 Apr 12, 20:12:44 I don't kown how there are people believe in? this bullshit of "men in the moon". also they are not? ... By: unlaughable. on 20 Apr 12, 19:16:40 also they are not? using moon rocks/sand and how do you know ... By: callmetucker. on 13 Apr 12, 01:49:49 and how do you know that you couldnt simulate that for sure? did you travel to the moon? even if you are some type of scientist you would not know if it is more "puffy" than earth you know why? because no one has been to the moon, because if we had why wouldnt? we go back? MOON LANDING FAKE. The dust on the ... By: tonysofla. on 11 Apr 12, 16:06:09 The dust on the moon is probbaly more "puffy" too as the gravity is less. You could not? simulate that on earth. Could the flag wave ... By: geurt662. on 10 Apr 12, 18:34:41 Could the flag wave bij gasses? coming out of the engine of the rocket? listen? to the last ... By: rondelcorlette. on 07 Apr 12, 00:28:21 listen? to the last sentence and do the math... think ;) Stop feeding the ... By: pipercub123456. on 05 Apr 12, 21:03:27 Stop feeding the truther...they can't be helped..you are tring to have a battle of wits with the mentally handicaped...no matter how many times you flush,? you can't get rid of their mineset... Since the gravity ... By: gwidao123. on 05 Apr 12, 20:50:39 Since the gravity in the moon is considerably lower then the earth's, its a lot easier for the dust grains to pile up on each other and maintain? an imprint, plus its easier to displace them, meaning you could probably make an enormous sand castle on the moon very easily. You weigh 6 times ... By: BaconWhitEggs. on 03 Apr 12, 20:59:07 You weigh 6 times less on the moon yes but consider you weigh 75 kilos? and I ave no clue how much a space suit weighs but lets say 25 kilos that's a 100 kilo. and a 3rd of that is 33 kilos and I believe that's plenty to make a imprint. Wow, are? you dense ... By: aliensuit1495. on 03 Apr 12, 02:34:31 Wow, are? you dense or something? Scientific proof in front of your eyes, yet you still choose to remain in your ignorance. What ABOUT the flag ... By: SpreadingtheMuse. on 02 Apr 12, 21:01:07 What ABOUT the flag? Its a flimsy piece of cloth in? a frictionless environment. Try to STOP IT from moving. Any vibration at all would set it off America landed? and ... By: SpreadingtheMuse. on 02 Apr 12, 21:00:14 America landed? and you're a retard ;) We're going to ... By: SpreadingtheMuse. on 02 Apr 12, 20:59:57 We're going to trust Mythbusters before we? believe ignorant conspiratards whining for attention online. Just so you know We're going to ... By: SpreadingtheMuse. on 02 Apr 12, 20:59:40 We're going to trust Mythbusters before we believe ignorant conspiratards whining for attention online.? Just so you know its called? moon ... By: michiman57. on 02 Apr 12, 15:35:59 its called? moon DUST. its not hard to make a print in fine dust Of course not. They ... By: TheGreatSparky. on 02 Apr 12, 05:56:21 Of course not. They landed ON? it, not IN it. Sheesh. These so called " ... By: Bees123Knees. on 02 Apr 12, 01:32:03 These so called "myth-busters"are so? obviously in the government's pockets.Super transparent. Do not trust a word they say. Stfu? noob By: lolzerscam. on 01 Apr 12, 16:00:41 Stfu? noob America DID NOT ... By: TheWildDingeo. on 01 Apr 12, 14:01:36 America DID NOT LAND IN THE DAMN MOON? THERE LIERS Why not? FOX ... By: loperspest. on 31 Mar 12, 11:22:55 Why not? FOX showed the infamous 'documetary' "Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon?'' If you disagree with their results, do? the experiments yourself. What? about the ... By: meggiemoo101. on 31 Mar 12, 10:14:12 What? about the flag? :/ wait wait wait... ... By: MrErikAvA. on 29 Mar 12, 16:31:43 wait wait wait... this is a program that is owned by a national network! you actually think they would let Mythbusters bust these myths!? that would ruin history!? yea? sure... (Y) I don't see stars ... By: loperspest. on 26 Mar 12, 19:48:42 I don't see stars in photos with similar exposure levels taken from the Soyuz, ISS, Mir, the Space Shuttle, Gemini, Vostok, Mercury, Voskhod, Shenzhou, or Salyut either. Stars are dim, the sun is bright. Any increase in star brightness from a lack of atmosphere would also mean an equal increase in brightness from the sun, so to properly expose? the sunlit lunar surface, you need too fast an exposure to pick up stars. Besides, if stars should be there, why not add them? Mythbusters Moon flag waving hoax Posted by: Dolfan0925 Video duration: 200 seconds Global video hits: 429918 Debunking the theory that a breeze was blowing on the Moon when the flag was planted. Related: mythbusters, moon, landing, hoax, conspiracy Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: @shirshakbt Omfg? ... By: judgejudyslover. on 22 May 12, 19:01:21 @shirshakbt Omfg? all I said was I wasn't convinced So how did they ... By: shirshakbt. on 22 May 12, 06:40:18 So how did they leave? a prism behind that would reflect a laser beam pointed at it from the earth? Then the rover ... By: SpreadingtheMuse. on 18 May 12, 18:41:11 Then the rover shots have to be? real, on the moon. As the dust kicked up clearly shows zero air resistance, impossible on the Earth @SpreadingtheMuse? ... By: judgejudyslover. on 16 May 12, 22:58:07 @SpreadingtheMuse? No Are you suggesting ... By: SpreadingtheMuse. on 16 May 12, 22:16:04 Are you suggesting they built a vacuum chamber big enough to drive? around miles and and mile on the rover? What it does do is ... By: loperspest. on 16 May 12, 20:13:41 What it does do is prove this specific myth, this? claim wrong, Besides, I have seen no evidence of a vacuum chamber big enough to film Apollo, including miles of driving with the rover. It proves that it ... By: judgejudyslover. on 15 May 12, 11:00:50 It proves that it can? be done in a vacuum. Doesn't prove they actually went! And it doesn't, I'm not saying they did or didn't just pointing out that it doesn't prove they went :) When you watch the ... By: gilgammesh1. on 27 Apr 12, 19:52:41 When you watch the moon landing video? you can just tell it isnt wind. The flag mmoves so unnatural. COMIN? TO SAVE THE ... By: CKNYoung. on 13 Apr 12, 15:19:37 COMIN? TO SAVE THE MOTHERFUCKIN DAY YEAH im not american but ... By: skwad03. on 11 Apr 12, 17:55:44 im not american but they proved that the moon landing is real so i can AMERICA FUCK? YEAH! Ha no? hard feelings By: jwrz217. on 10 Apr 12, 20:56:02 Ha no? hard feelings hahaha If I? was ... By: Padgeify. on 09 Apr 12, 04:26:24 hahaha If I? was intelligent I would of never of clicked post. TY for reminding me that Im an Idiot :) You just? did haha By: jwrz217. on 09 Apr 12, 03:15:55 You just? did haha In? Soviet Russia, ... By: vigo894. on 04 Apr 12, 08:39:16 In? Soviet Russia, rocket lands on you. Eh eh eh. Did they didnt they ... By: Padgeify. on 03 Apr 12, 02:05:39 Did they didnt they? .Argue all you want but some silly cunt is going to mention the? artificial hollow moon theory on here eventually. I don't think the ... By: Rhubba. on 02 Apr 12, 16:43:09 I don't think the Apollo flags flap like they're in the wind. Quite the opposite. But I think you should conduct your own experiment to prove Mythbusters wrong instead of just sharing untested observations. My challenge to? hoax believers is to stop looking at the photos and footage, because you've done that and we all know what you think, and start conducting your own scientific experiments witnessed and verified by neutral observers. In a video we see ... By: hunchbacked. on 02 Apr 12, 16:36:19 In a video we see the flag flap always on the same side instead of going from one side to the other, and it also? stops quite fast flapping; only the wind can do that, not inertia. Just look at a flag ... By: hunchbacked. on 02 Apr 12, 16:35:58 Just look at a flag which flaps in the wind, and compare with the way the flag flaps in the experiment of the mythbusters. Then look how the flag flaps in the Apollo videos; it flaps like a flag which flaps in the wind and not like the flag in the demonstration of the mythbusters. You know why? Because, in the demonstration of? the mythbusters, the flag regularly flaps from one side to the other. At least they ... By: Rhubba. on 02 Apr 12, 16:13:59 At least they performed an experiment to see what happens. Why don't you try an experiment of your own to prove your point? Until? you try, you've just got a hunch and a theory. RUSSIA was first !! ... By: ganzegal77. on 28 Mar 12, 04:16:26 RUSSIA was first !!! lol ... hahaha ...? the aluminum was ... By: sweetduster. on 26 Mar 12, 19:30:21 the aluminum was bent in such a way to give the illusion? of a waving flag, less significant movements translate to a fluttering motion. The flag was moving but not as dramatically as it would seem ;-) what's? the ... By: XxEvilKnightzxX. on 26 Mar 12, 18:56:15 what's? the difference using aluminium or cloth flag? Myth busted my ass. ... By: sweetduster. on 26 Mar 12, 04:55:56 Myth busted my ass. They didn't test the right thing. True Nasa used? a flag, but it wasn't a cloth flag. It was made out of aluminum. If they had taken a closer look at the video they'd realize that. was 2 flags << ... By: EGMAG. on 26 Mar 12, 01:12:16 was 2 flags I? HATE MYTHBUSTERS ... By: EGMAG. on 26 Mar 12, 01:10:59 I? HATE MYTHBUSTERS FOR THESE LIES They Fell For My Hoax Video Posted by: EdwardCurrent Video duration: 217 seconds Global video hits: 98858 Many 9/11 "Truthers" weren't fooled by my ridiculous fake video of 7 World Trade Center being taken down by controlled demolition. But those who were, well..... gullible people are gullible. Related: september, 11th, truth, building, wtc7, twin, towers, conspiracy, theories, explosives, thermite, debunking, poe, steven, alex, jones, mormon, kook, david, ray, griffin, richard, gage, deluded, nutjobs, bullshit Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: Never.Trust.Youtube ... By: RamboCujo. on 26 May 12, 23:18:21 Never.Trust.Youtube.? awesome fucking ... By: nicka531. on 25 May 12, 11:06:21 awesome fucking video man. i am a "911 truther" and was linked to ur original vid yesterday. i told everyone that may have seen it that it was pretty much definitely? a fake. it really makes you wonder though, what the fuck IS real? lol. I see that you've ... By: azul8811. on 25 May 12, 04:56:09 I see that you've made a post? concerning this video about Building 7, so I've got a very specific question? for you. I think it is a critically important question as the answer has rather significant ramifications. Here it is. ?? Why? do? you think that? the? Fire? Department??? gave? a final order? to? abandon? the WTC7? building and? surrounding area at? 2:30?? P.M.?(The? building? collapsed? at 5:20:52 P.M.) Thank you. This is in ... By: ThoughtGaze. on 24 May 12, 14:45:52 This is in wikipedia and these statements are linked with sources so you can check on your own. "BBC News, The Christian Science Monitor, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Institute for Public Accuracy, and? Media Matters for America contend that members of the administration repeatedly over the years made suggestive statements with the implied message there was a link between Saddam Hussein and the attacks." Oh good, thanks. " ... By: ThoughtGaze. on 24 May 12, 14:44:58 Oh good, thanks. "The Bush administration also stated the Iraq war was part of the War on Terror, something later questioned or contested." Also," The U.S. stated that the intent was to remove"a regime that developed and? used weapons of mass destruction, that HARBORED AND SUPPORTED TERRORISTS, committed outrageous human rights abuses, and defied the just demands of the United Nations and the world".This is all in the Iraq Resolution.Now you have proven yourself to be ill-informed. We are done. Im sorry wait what? ... By: CuttingOrphans. on 24 May 12, 09:27:17 Im sorry wait what? What did 9/11 have to do with Iraq. We didn't go to Iraq until 2 years after 9/11.? Are you still in 2nd grade? There were no ... By: 13falls123. on 24 May 12, 05:02:26 There were no detonation charges in the seismic record, at? least not according to seismologists. The signal of the collapse lasted 18 seconds. Bush is a nice guy? ... By: ThoughtGaze. on 24 May 12, 04:47:19 Bush is a nice guy? He was nice to you? when you met him and therefore he can't make decisions that involve killing people senselessly? You realize we went to war with Iraq for no reason whatsoever, oh sorry because Saddam MIGHT have had WMD's which was completely baseless. We used 9/11 as a pretext for war with Iraq. Bush didn't even TRY to go after osama bin laden, but of course, he is a nice guy. Sorry that's where you're deluded. terrorist attack ... By: CuttingOrphans. on 24 May 12, 01:37:19 terrorist attack on? Houston in order to invade Cuba? Well, the president said "Fuck no" and a bunch of CIA agents came out and told people as well. Because anybody ... By: CuttingOrphans. on 24 May 12, 01:36:30 Because anybody that thinks any government, especially one as successful as the US,? could plant explosives in many buildings, without anybody that works in the building noticing, and nobody that was involved coming out to tell the world, and that any US president, especially one that is as nice as Bush (He was a nice guy, but he was a horrible president. I have met him, he really is cool), would approve of it, is stupid. There is no empirical evidence.Remember the plot to have a domestic (Cont) If? there is a ... By: ThoughtGaze. on 24 May 12, 01:01:10 If? there is a seismic signal, it is likely (based on how it collapsed so fast and so symmetrically) that the signal was produced by explosions. The official report says the building collapsed due to fires. Even if such a building did collapse due to fires, it would fall in a messy chaotic way. You would see the steel structure supports (the bone structure of the building) relatively in tact while the floors would buckle, and all of this would certainly take many hours to days to actually occur. Where is this ... By: ThoughtGaze. on 24 May 12, 00:53:20 Where is this seismic signal? Point to sources. Here is a video of engineers that disagree (and they explain quite well) why building 7 collapsing, going? from motionless to free fall acceleration is enough to question the official report. /watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw Why is it "fucking ... By: ThoughtGaze. on 24 May 12, 00:42:15 Why is it "fucking dumb" to believe that?? "building 7 came ... By: 13falls123. on 23 May 12, 23:00:17 "building 7 came down extremely fast" How do you account for? the seismic signal of the collapse lasting 18 seconds? first, put on a ... By: ANTIMKrebirth. on 22 May 12, 01:08:08 first, put on a fuckin shirt... second, yes obviously (by statistics alone) some people will buy your hoax... that's not surprising... you haven't shown anything third, building 7 came down extremely fast... this is like the case of the emperors' new clothes... the people that don't say anything about the obvious truth are scared to seem foolish, but? the truth is, i've never seen a building fall that fast due to damage from the top... find ONE case where that does happen, otherwise shut up Buddy says " ... By: GrievanDark. on 21 May 12, 17:46:59 Buddy says "Explosions heard throughout the whole day. Usually? things like cars."... like it just so happened that there was a shooting for a new Hollywood "Best ___ Movie Of The Year" (as nearly ALL new movies get declared on release) on the same street at the same time and date as the? tragedy. I used to argue with these 9/11 deniers, but then arguing with one became more like trying to argue with a Christian, and Atheist and Scientists know what a nightmare that is! I dislike the ... By: CuttingOrphans. on 20 May 12, 02:45:43 I dislike the American Government, but I am not a? truther. It's fucking dumb to believe that. lol truthers will ... By: PoetryHound. on 17 May 12, 21:26:11 lol truthers will believe anything if it's? anti-gov't. Theist fall for ... By: 12dollarsand78cents. on 13 May 12, 07:03:58 Theist fall for anything. Edward Current, thanks for exposing? the suckers. File No. 9 1? 10048 ... By: asicit2b. on 11 May 12, 21:29:36 File No. 9 1? 10048 WORLD TRADE CENTER TASK FORCE ... Dude.....when are ... By: Massaricossudo. on 10 May 12, 15:43:55 Dude.....when are you going to Irak? You should live? there. This is how ... By: xzanthius. on 09 May 12, 10:56:46 This is how debunkers argue. They ignore the strong links and attack the weakest. So I will point out that the 911 commission was a HUGE exercise is conflict of interest, that it was headed by Bush, and that even given that the commissioners were handpicked by the establishment they still complained that they were hamstrung. So the debunkers? will scream and cry that I havent read the report. WTF? Great job debating. "your question was ... By: buddyfreakinhoIIy. on 09 May 12, 03:50:15 "your question was bullshit (about what page the errors are found)" It's remarkable how little scrutiny truthers apply to their own supposed evidence. Not only do? you have no clue about what pages the errors are on, you've never even read the report. Some crackpot in a kookspiracy video told you what to think about the report so? you dutifully repeat what he said like a spoonfed zombie. Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40   Golf Related Videos Golf Tournaments - Pga Tour - Golf Vacations - Golf Equipments - Golf Clubs - Golf Carts - Golf Balls - Golf Galaxy - Callaway Golf You like it? Share it! Social Bookmarking

Golf videos :: Videos are copyright their respective owners :: Feedback powered by: Customer Feedback