![William Katt answers Christina\](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/1AzG00xA6bI/2.jpg "William Katt answers Christina\") |
William Katt answers Christina's note
Posted by: KiraJenLove
Video duration: 27 seconds
While I was at the DOTD Convention in Indianapolis, my friend and fellow GAH fan from the Facebook fanpage had asked me to have some things autographed (one of which was a VHS copy of "Carrie", in which he played Tommy Ross), and she wanted William Katt to read her note on video. Although he didn't want to read it aloud, he did answer it for her.
Related: william, katt, days, of, the, dead, convention
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
|
|
|
|
Golf Related VideosYou like it? Share it!
Social Bookmarking 
|
![It doesn\](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/jvaNP5xH4HI/2.jpg "It doesn\")
![Re: Alex Jones\](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/SuBc0hJFA40/2.jpg "Re: Alex Jones\")
![\"Greatest American Hero\" costume contest prize recipient](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/6zxyn7dZLI8/2.jpg "\\"Greatest American Hero\\" costume contest prize recipient")
Latest comments made on this video:
By: KalimaShaktide. on 21 May 12, 16:42:04
Gosh you even know what sandstone is and you still believe your analogy is not flawed. It is like saying that since you can mix a color in water by just steering it in a glass it? should be the same result with ice cubes. I really can t dumb it down further for you to realize how bad your argumentation is. Anyway, you should not comment on topics you have no training in. Do me a favor and go as a geologist professor at your local university/school...maybe you will learn something
By: KiraJenLove. on 21 May 12, 05:15:02
The GC is made of sandstone, that is, sand that has turned to stone over time (but not "millions of years"). Mineralization can occur in mere decades.?
By: KiraJenLove. on 21 May 12, 05:13:27
The layers? of the GC are not caused by weathering. In fact, there are no erosion marks at all between the layers, which is what you would find if they were really "millions of years" old. My point is that layers can be created within just a few years, and it doesn't require "millions of years" to do so. The dump trucks didn't create the layers in the sand pile.
By: KalimaShaktide. on 17 May 12, 15:24:59
Have you ever heard the expression 'apples and oranges'? If you compare sand layering it must mean you believe the grand canyon is made of sand which it isn t. Unless you only wanted to show you understand what layers are and if so then sand is irrelevant. I can make layers with? my clothes on the floor... 'hey they are layers too so they must be man made so the GC must be man made' is a similar argumentation to what I hear from you here. A mind is a terrible thing to waste
By: KiraJenLove. on 17 May 12, 13:34:49
I am sorry that you fail to see the similarity between the layering in the pile of sand and the layering in the GC. No one here has? yet addressed this.
By: KalimaShaktide. on 15 May 12, 03:27:33
It is painful to listen to this video. You compared sand being dumped by? trucks to erosion of hard rocks from weathering? Don't you see why your comparison is retarded? "I don t see any difference to me, it all looks the same" and that is the reason why people make fun of you. You do not know what you are talking about. If you do not know geology you should not make comments geological topics, especially when comparing sand to limestone...honestly it is painful to listen to.
By: lawilson200. on 08 May 12, 08:16:36
Wow! You completely evaded the point. I was truly amaze that each of your explanations did not remotely reflect the actual conditons observed at the Grand Canyon or at the Channeled Scablands. You see in the real world, explanations must be based on observed conditions. You did not even try. Worst, your one resource that you gave is a quote mine book, I love geology, People like Bretz and Baker worked hard gathering the? data so we can understand the story of EWa.
By: KiraJenLove. on 08 May 12, 06:31:40
Actually, I drive through there all the time, and have done some? walking there. It would be pointless to publish anything with a creationist bent in any evolutionary journal, as it would simply be censored and the scientist would be blacklisted. Asking why there are no creationist articles in evolutionary journals is like asking why there were no books on capitalism in libraries in the Soviet Union in the 50's. Is it because capitalism doesn't work? No.
By: KiraJenLove. on 08 May 12, 06:26:46
It's not based on the laws of physics - and your dates that you acquire still have to go through the filter of evolutionary preconceived biases, which? is where your assumptions come in.
By: lawilson200. on 07 May 12, 04:33:34
Wow! You are in complete denial. I am wondering,have you even bothered to read Bretz? Baker? Even Oard? The last? is a young-earth creationist. Just how much time have you spent woking in Eastern Washington to make your determination. I am very much looking forward for you to support your claims with an actual published paper in a peer review journal.
By: lawilson200. on 07 May 12, 04:30:28
So in this case, where did the Palouse come from? The soils of the Palouse country are dunes developed by flying dust from the Okonogon and Purcell Galciers during the Ice Age. The loess of the Palouse acts as a blanket, covering the CRBG. I will let you in on a secret,? if something is on top, they tend to be younger than what is on bottom. It is called the law of horizontality, which was recognized by Nicholas Steno in 16th century, before he became a Bishop.
By: lawilson200. on 07 May 12, 04:25:32
It is called the laws of physics, no assumptions are necessary.? Volcanic rocks are dated all of the time.
By: KiraJenLove. on 06 May 12, 21:09:59
"I hope you are aware that the Scablands were actually the product of 90 (or more) massive floods caused by the drainage of? Glacial Lake Missola? " This is an incorrect interpretation of what they see. What they are seeing is evidence for one big global Flood, but interpret it to be several local Floods, because of the strata between them and their bias? that the layers of strata represent long eras of time. But the strata were all laid down at the same time via hydrologic sorting.
By: KiraJenLove. on 06 May 12, 21:06:10
the Ice Age by 6 million years. If the CRBG is made up of igneous rock, then it occurred during the volcanic activity that occurred during the Ice Age that immediately followed the flood (and lasted a few hundred years, not thousands), and there was no volcanic activity before the Flood, which occurred approximately 1656 A.M. (Anno Mundi - 1656? years from Creation).
By: KiraJenLove. on 06 May 12, 21:01:57
There is no way that you can prove via a source external to your dating methods that they are accurate. I can tell you that the methods that evolutionists use to date anything are full of at least 25 assumptions that are not accounted for. These always provide a false, overextended date.Therefore one cannot say that? "these dates are accurate", because you have nothing else to go on for the dates but these erroneous methods. If there are no "millions of years", then the CRBG cannot predate contd)
By: lawilson200. on 06 May 12, 07:40:12
Interesting. You seem to be taking a position advocated by William Hobbs. He was deeply opposed to J Harlan Bretzs work showing the Scablands were a product of megafloods. Hobbs argued that the primary agent was glaciers. However, the paper he wrote was? so bad, Bretz used his influence to see that it was not published. Hobbs ended up self-publishing. I have a copy, it was bad. Glaciers had no impact in the area of the cRBG.
By: lawilson200. on 06 May 12, 07:26:30
I was wondering how long it took you to bring in my favorite place into this. I have worked at Mount St Helens. I have also worked at the Grand Canyon. The two places are completely different. The deposits at Mount St Helens are associated to the landslide and pyroclastic deposits. Since the mountain receives 150 inches of precep per year, Lowitt and Step channels were quickly established, but they do not compare to the GC. The place is similar to Pinatubo, another? volcano.
By: lawilson200. on 06 May 12, 07:21:23
Very good, part A is actually correct, However, you send part is in error, There is no evidence of lime mud accumulating rapidly. Just how much time have you lived in the PNW? Western Washington and much of Oregon are dominated by modern and extinct volcanoes. The geology on this is clear. Chemically, our basalts is closely? match to the basalts left by the Yellowstone Hot Spot. I actually find this interesting that Newberry near Bend, is related to Yellowstone.
By: lawilson200. on 06 May 12, 07:14:55
There is no mystery about the conditons which resulted with the initial formations of the Grand Canyon. When I looked into the Canyon, I see 5 oceans, a desert, a river delta, an estuary, isolated islands and? even a mountain range that was once taller than todays Himalayas. You should know, no geologist claim the river carved the Canyon over 70 Ma. Glaciers were not responsible, I do not know where you found that reference. Personally, I support the stream capture hypothesis,
By: lawilson200. on 06 May 12, 07:09:25
You said something which was? actually accurate earlier. The Colorado is a meandering river. Now looke at the Scablands. Do you find any signs of meanders preserved in the carved out Coulees? This is beause during floods, you do not get meanders. Even in the Grand Canyon, the meanders are preserved into the features. Now I will tell you, the carving of the canyon is not a settled issue. It is a question of what the Colorado was doing and when it was doing it.
By: KiraJenLove. on 06 May 12, 07:02:38
(quoting source - "The Evolution Handbook", Vance Ferrell, Ch.? 12d)
By: lawilson200. on 06 May 12, 07:02:36
What is an evolutionist? I am a geologist and I am a Christian. We know megaflood hhave occurred, The Scabland is one of about a dozen known locations around the world. These massive floods do leave distinctive charateristics. There is no geological evidence supporting a global flood, Some of the greatest geologists of the early 19th Century, Sedgwick, Biuckland, Scrope, Murchison sought to find evidence of Noahs Flood, but each recognized this? evidence did not exist.
By: KiraJenLove. on 06 May 12, 07:00:05
Another example is the Toutle River Valley outside of Mt. St. Helens. This is a modern, observable example of how the Grand Canyon would have formed. The canyons outside of the mountain look just like the walls of the Grand Canyon, complete with layering. Yet we? know that the Toutle River did not create those canyons. They were created by a catastrophic event. The river just trickled through later (path of least resistance), but had nothing to do with its formation.
By: lawilson200. on 06 May 12, 06:56:58
You are referring to the Okonogon Lobe of North-Central Washington and Purcell Lobe of Northern Idaho, The Okonogon Lobe blocked the Columbia River, forming Glacial Lake Columbia (about where the current Grand Coulle Dam is now) and th ePurcell Lobe blocked the Clark Fork River, forming Glacial Lake Missoula, However, the CRBG predates the Ice Age ice and lakes by 6 milluon years. I don't care if? you don't trust those dates. They are accurate, unless you can demonstrate otherwise.
By: KiraJenLove. on 06 May 12, 06:56:28
(Ice Age caused by a drying out of the soil over the planet and a lack of trees to slow the winds that swept across the Earth - also mentioned in Scripture after the Flood), The advancing glaciers tore out the CRG igneous rock.? The glaciers melt, then the slow-moving CR "trickled" through this path later, fed by mountain glaciers. This is what we observe today.